Just to be clear for people who saw the comments on "Another Stupid Politician" post.
I don't discriminate against people who are born with a disadvantage, I only use the word "retard" against people who are born without mental defect but chose to be one. Thus i enjoy humiliating people without natural mental defect with the word "retard".
4/23/2012
4/22/2012
Marriage by law is a twisted form of love
Don't get me wrong, marriage is fine, but marriage by law is stupid.
It's the a rarity in law that people actually have the choice to not partake in, why would you want to give up your liberties with another law?
Why would you need the law to bind you if you truely love each other? Some say "we truely love each other but we got to protect ourselves for the future, what if one of us turns unfaithful? "
You shouldn't even marry if you still have doubts. If you need a law to force you to stay together, then you don't really know if you love each other.
And seriously? You love each other now to the point where you have the impulse for "wanting" to have a law enforced upon you but you are afraid of the future?
Then don't get married , remain dating til your love have matured enough to not having the need
of law to make you feel like staying together.
What if i want a baby? The government gives a bonus if we're legally married and have a baby.
Well , don't have a baby, If you need that bonus, it only means you financially suck and whatever great delusion you have for your baby probably won't come true and likely to be another generation of slaves. Stop gambling with people's life.
It's the a rarity in law that people actually have the choice to not partake in, why would you want to give up your liberties with another law?
Why would you need the law to bind you if you truely love each other? Some say "we truely love each other but we got to protect ourselves for the future, what if one of us turns unfaithful? "
You shouldn't even marry if you still have doubts. If you need a law to force you to stay together, then you don't really know if you love each other.
And seriously? You love each other now to the point where you have the impulse for "wanting" to have a law enforced upon you but you are afraid of the future?
Then don't get married , remain dating til your love have matured enough to not having the need
of law to make you feel like staying together.
What if i want a baby? The government gives a bonus if we're legally married and have a baby.
Well , don't have a baby, If you need that bonus, it only means you financially suck and whatever great delusion you have for your baby probably won't come true and likely to be another generation of slaves. Stop gambling with people's life.
Inception (2010) Film Rant
There is absolutely no original idea and nothing is intelligent about this film
A dream in a dream in a dream has already been introduced in "Existenz"
And planting an idea via the subconscious is nothing original either . i can list bigger ideas other movies plant . "The Matrix", planting the idea into everyone in their world making them believe they are in reality and Total Recall 1990, a false 2 week vacation memory has been planted in Arnold.
And for people that says dreams and virtual reality is different, wrong. What is presented in inception is a virtual reality, because a gadget is needed to enter the psuedo-reality, and a place that is constructed for the subject to feel real using a gadget is a virtual reality. If you wanna watch a dream, watch paprika or The Holy Mountain .
So what is new in inception ? nothing .
A dream in a dream in a dream has already been introduced in "Existenz"
And planting an idea via the subconscious is nothing original either . i can list bigger ideas other movies plant . "The Matrix", planting the idea into everyone in their world making them believe they are in reality and Total Recall 1990, a false 2 week vacation memory has been planted in Arnold.
And for people that says dreams and virtual reality is different, wrong. What is presented in inception is a virtual reality, because a gadget is needed to enter the psuedo-reality, and a place that is constructed for the subject to feel real using a gadget is a virtual reality. If you wanna watch a dream, watch paprika or The Holy Mountain .
So what is new in inception ? nothing .
And the movie is plain stupid, the first hour consist of only exposition, explaining the rules of the virtual reality and the next half contradicting the rules that they've made up. The conclusion is also dumb and cliche.
How did this movie get critically acclaim for its originality?
How did this movie get critically acclaim for its originality?
Another stupid politician
Read this, if you have no idea what is going on.
http://freddwzz.blogspot.com/2012/04/prologue-to-recent-scandal-that.html
"Charged for an offence that they were probably not aware of
I am concerned about the decision taken by the public prosecutor to charge the 44 men for having commercial sex with the the under-aged girl.
I am not defending the actions of these men. Rather, I am questioning the decision to charge them, based on the evidence that was available. According to what I read in the papers, these men were enticed by an online website that showed the girl to be 18 years old. If she was below 18 years, she must have deliberately lied about her age. Surely, she is the bigger culprit?
Let me give you this analogy. I bought a piece of cake and gave it to my friend. My friend died from food poisoning after eating the cake. I was not aware about the ingredients in the cake. Should I be charged for homicide, being the person who delivered the cake? Was I responsible to check that the cake was fit for consumption, when I had no reason to suspect otherwise?
For a person to be charged for a crime, there must be evidence that he knew of the crime or had to duty to find out. Did the police had grounds to know that the 44 men knew that the prostitute was below the legal age? If they had the duty to find out, how could it be done? Quite likely, the prostitute would not want to show her real name by producing the identity card.
Did the police ask each of the 44 men for their side of the story? Was there any reason to reject their excuse that they did not know her real age? Should these people be let off with a warning? Could they pay a penalty without being charged in court and without admission of guilt?
In Singapore, a person is condemned by public opinion when they are charged in court, regardless of whether they are eventually convicted. We are destroying the reputation and careers of 44 people by taking this drastic action. Is this the type of outcome that is desirable for the future of Singapore?
I wish to repeat that I am not condoning the action of these 44 men and that action should be taken to protect our under-aged girls. But this is probably a bad case to act on. And it may be unjust to the people who are involved.
I hope that the police and public prosecutor will review this matter and find a better solution - before more people and their families are harmed unnecessarily and excessively.
Tan Kin Lian"
http://freddwzz.blogspot.com/2012/04/prologue-to-recent-scandal-that.html
"Charged for an offence that they were probably not aware of
I am concerned about the decision taken by the public prosecutor to charge the 44 men for having commercial sex with the the under-aged girl.
I am not defending the actions of these men. Rather, I am questioning the decision to charge them, based on the evidence that was available. According to what I read in the papers, these men were enticed by an online website that showed the girl to be 18 years old. If she was below 18 years, she must have deliberately lied about her age. Surely, she is the bigger culprit?
Let me give you this analogy. I bought a piece of cake and gave it to my friend. My friend died from food poisoning after eating the cake. I was not aware about the ingredients in the cake. Should I be charged for homicide, being the person who delivered the cake? Was I responsible to check that the cake was fit for consumption, when I had no reason to suspect otherwise?
For a person to be charged for a crime, there must be evidence that he knew of the crime or had to duty to find out. Did the police had grounds to know that the 44 men knew that the prostitute was below the legal age? If they had the duty to find out, how could it be done? Quite likely, the prostitute would not want to show her real name by producing the identity card.
Did the police ask each of the 44 men for their side of the story? Was there any reason to reject their excuse that they did not know her real age? Should these people be let off with a warning? Could they pay a penalty without being charged in court and without admission of guilt?
In Singapore, a person is condemned by public opinion when they are charged in court, regardless of whether they are eventually convicted. We are destroying the reputation and careers of 44 people by taking this drastic action. Is this the type of outcome that is desirable for the future of Singapore?
I wish to repeat that I am not condoning the action of these 44 men and that action should be taken to protect our under-aged girls. But this is probably a bad case to act on. And it may be unjust to the people who are involved.
I hope that the police and public prosecutor will review this matter and find a better solution - before more people and their families are harmed unnecessarily and excessively.
Tan Kin Lian"
That analogy he has given us, is fkin dumb.
No one would offer a poisonous cake to a friend unless you want him dead, and all these men who patronize this 17yo whore service definitely has a fetish for young cunts, so it would make perfect sense psychologically to be even more arouse by a 17yo but it would not make sense psychologically when you know the cake is poisonous and and you still offer it to your friend, unless you want him dead or you're fkin dumb.
Life
your ambition
your goals
your freedom
your ties
all are lies
fill the emptiness
with false importance
confused at 10
ignorant at 20
earning by 30
living at 40
life seeps in by 50
depress at 60
depress at 70
most likely dead by 80
your goals
your freedom
your ties
all are lies
fill the emptiness
with false importance
confused at 10
ignorant at 20
earning by 30
living at 40
life seeps in by 50
depress at 60
depress at 70
most likely dead by 80
Outcast
ominous brass,
a prologue to cloister dread.
ascension of paranoia,
haply inducing doubt.
love ones turns assumed foe;
the mind wanders it's tortured cell.
solitude turns exilement;
stranded incognito.
looking glass with dead eyes,
reflection is deemed vile
sinister string,
a prelude to raging wrath.
ascension of indignition,
comes overwhelming hate.
once a nymph, turns grim;
wrongful form of intent.
indignition turns resentment;
the fallen.
looking glass with departed eyes,
reflection of despair.
a prologue to cloister dread.
ascension of paranoia,
haply inducing doubt.
love ones turns assumed foe;
the mind wanders it's tortured cell.
solitude turns exilement;
stranded incognito.
looking glass with dead eyes,
reflection is deemed vile
sinister string,
a prelude to raging wrath.
ascension of indignition,
comes overwhelming hate.
once a nymph, turns grim;
wrongful form of intent.
indignition turns resentment;
the fallen.
looking glass with departed eyes,
reflection of despair.
The Aftermath to a recent Scandal that happened in my country
Read on what had happened here - http://www.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne%2BNews/Crime/Story/A1Story20120416-340042.html
This crime shouldn't even have existed in the first place if not for the twisted law.
Anyway after the scandal, the media starts exposing the name of the men involved thus directly inciting the twisted public to shame them, and the twisted public felt that, it ain't fun enough just by shaming the men, so they protested to have the media/government/judge expose the female's name but whoever is in-charged didn't do so which left the twisted public unsatisfied, so a political leader tried to calm raging retards with the following message.
"Quote:
Discriminating adults? So adults doesn't deserve a second chance? look how the media is treating the horndogs, like they really have done something abominable;
The poor brainwashed 17yo girl with better IQ than other females that work for a month to buy 1 prada then found out that she could cast off the phony morality that "humans" have created and by casting off that phony morality, she could buy a prada a day, made the decision to live off stupid rich horndogs. And life went on, until the man-made and hypocritic "law" decides that they want some action.
Source of contradiction and inconsistency - "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_Singapore" - "Prostitution in Singapore is legal, but various prostitution-related activities are not. This includes public solicitation, living on the earnings of a prostitute and maintaining a brothel. In practice, police unofficially tolerate and monitor a limited number of brothels."
The law is so twisted, by not questioning the hypocritic law my country people are supporting the fact that adults prostitute themselves for low wage due to circumstances(eg. feed family) is okay but a 17yo(already beyond the age of reason and consent according to our "law") without any baggage doing it willingly is wrong. In other words, being forced to be a prostitute due to circumstances is okay but its wrong when one willingly does it.
You're anti-humanity, anti-free will, anti-human rights if you are a supporter of our law.
And even more twisted, we have a lawyer calling the poor girl a hardcore prostitute and lawyers claiming that the girl is at fault because she didn't disclose her age. Come on now, don't act like the horndogs will back off just because she's 17, i bet they will get even harder.
So conclusion, who is at fault here? I don't blame the horndogs, the whore nor the pimp but Our twisted society, our funny government and the hypocritic law.
This crime shouldn't even have existed in the first place if not for the twisted law.
Anyway after the scandal, the media starts exposing the name of the men involved thus directly inciting the twisted public to shame them, and the twisted public felt that, it ain't fun enough just by shaming the men, so they protested to have the media/government/judge expose the female's name but whoever is in-charged didn't do so which left the twisted public unsatisfied, so a political leader tried to calm raging retards with the following message.
"Quote:
The ongoing online vice ring saga which has already implicated 48 men who have been charged for having commercial sex with a minor has polarized public opinion in Singapore.
While some feel the identity of the prostitute should be kept confidential as she is still young, others want her to be shamed publicly as well to take responsibility for her actions.
In an interview with the media, prominent criminal lawyer Subhas Anandan who is acting for 10 of the men being charged pointed out bluntly that the girl does not deserve any protection under the law:
“How is anybody going to know what he is charged for when you don’t know who the girl is, and what her age is? Who are they trying to protect? As far as I am concerned, this girl does not deserve protection as she is a HARDCORE PROSTITUTE who got so many men into trouble”
However Young PAP Chairman and MP Teo Ser Luck disagrees.
Speaking to queries from the media, Mr Teo said:
“No matter what she did, she is still young. Exposing her identity in the media will not do anybody any good.”
His views were supported by another fellow MP Halimah Yacob who opined her future should be safe-guarded:
“Everyone deserves a chance to repent. The most important thing is, she should receive proper counseling in the future to prevent her from prostituting herself again.”
Despite her well intentions, it is highly unlikely that she will receive any ‘counseling’ in the first place because she is not charged for any offences and the authorities have no right to compel her to attend any counseling session unlike other juvenile offenders.
As she is 18 years old now, it remains to be seen if she will continue selling her body for easy and quick cash after this fiasco which only punishes her clients and allows her to get away without paying a price for it. "
Discriminating adults? So adults doesn't deserve a second chance? look how the media is treating the horndogs, like they really have done something abominable;
The lawmakers, the court, the judge are the source of shamelessness in this event, enforcing and defending an idealogy that contradicts the society that they have created , bunch of nitwits glorifying and sacralizing the female race, advertisements telling female that they should pamper themselves with unneeded jewelry, luxury products and a government that allows it to happen, even supporting them and evidently producing a generation of dumbed down materialistic females.
The poor brainwashed 17yo girl with better IQ than other females that work for a month to buy 1 prada then found out that she could cast off the phony morality that "humans" have created and by casting off that phony morality, she could buy a prada a day, made the decision to live off stupid rich horndogs. And life went on, until the man-made and hypocritic "law" decides that they want some action.
Source of contradiction and inconsistency - "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_Singapore" - "Prostitution in Singapore is legal, but various prostitution-related activities are not. This includes public solicitation, living on the earnings of a prostitute and maintaining a brothel. In practice, police unofficially tolerate and monitor a limited number of brothels."
So our law can close a blind eye to pimp making a living off underwage foreign prostitute that are really the ones suffering but couldn't close a blind eye to a 17yo product of our society, she whore herself willingly so she could have unneeded luxury products.
The law is so twisted, by not questioning the hypocritic law my country people are supporting the fact that adults prostitute themselves for low wage due to circumstances(eg. feed family) is okay but a 17yo(already beyond the age of reason and consent according to our "law") without any baggage doing it willingly is wrong. In other words, being forced to be a prostitute due to circumstances is okay but its wrong when one willingly does it.
You're anti-humanity, anti-free will, anti-human rights if you are a supporter of our law.
And even more twisted, we have a lawyer calling the poor girl a hardcore prostitute and lawyers claiming that the girl is at fault because she didn't disclose her age. Come on now, don't act like the horndogs will back off just because she's 17, i bet they will get even harder.
So conclusion, who is at fault here? I don't blame the horndogs, the whore nor the pimp but Our twisted society, our funny government and the hypocritic law.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)