Every proclaimed act of "morality" is an act of self interest.

Anyone who proclaim themself as Moralist are self interest, narcissistic individuals, morality only serves as a facade.


Killing is not wrong, it is just a natural instinct, like ants doesn't kill their own species of ants.
If killing our own species is objectively wrong that means ants have moral and if ants have moral, we're immoral for killing any being capable of moral.

Lying- lying is essential to society, if everyone is speaking the truth, the whole fallacious facade of politics will collapse.

Cheating- cheating is also essential to society, if no one is cheating, no one would buy products that they don't need thus consumerism totally contradicts morality.
Politics supports consumerism and consumerism supports advertisement and advertisement lie and cheats by claiming diamond ring is needed to prove "love" .

Respecting elders- Knowing the fact that they'll grow old someday, they expect new generation to respect them without questioning whether or not they deserve the respect. Respect should be earned not predetermined.

What if what that aged individual did in life is nothing respectable? An old rapist should not be respected unless you aspire to be a rapist.

They proclaim incest to be wrong because they want to have sex with other people's daughters.
Prostitution wrong because they don't want to marry someone who had sex with many people.
There is no reason to believe that Incest and prostitution to be wrong except being "immoral" and the reason i gave is rational.

We are different from other species only for our rationality and any other values are invented with it.

Rationality factors in how much information is available, and if morality existed, we probably wouldn't have exist, when human was still a meager race they probably had incestous relationship in order to procreate.

Short Film: Maya Deren - "Meshes of the Afternoon" Review

I got to know this film from imdb's "Similar movies, movies you may like" link, and "Meshes of the Afternoon" was beyond my expectation. Way ahead of its time editing and effect including "slow mo effect", brilliant score, haunting imagery and a captivating story-line in just 13mins.

The movie starts by introducing the actress "Maya Deren" herself and the core elements of the story with an emphasized shot on each of them, and each item might symbolize something, we get flowers, a key, a knife in a loaf of bread, a telephone. After the introduction "Maya Deren" went up to a room, stopped the record player and the film went silent, leading me to believe that the film's previous source of music came from that record player. After switching off the record player Maya Deren seemingly took a nap and things get crazy when the record started playing again without any manual assistance, or so i thought, and Maya Deren meeting a cloak figure with a mirror for a face, like in a dream or an out of body experience, stuck in an endless loop as the story-progress, and ultimately leading to a brilliant conclusion.

Don't miss this.

[Spoiler Alert] My interpretation

I think Maya Deren is portraying a boring housewife life caused by her husband imminently causing her suicide .

Insulting others with the word "Dog"

My country men and china invented scolding people "dog"
i don't know about other people but the dogs i've come across are all friendly and cute.
So i don't get the general idea of insulting someone using the word "dog".
Insulting people for their merits, is absolutely insane. To think of it, to actually feel insulted is rather stupid.
Let's list a few merit, dogs follow orders without questioning, dogs don't question what they are protecting for, dogs are friendly and cute... dogs are as smart as a 2 years old baby and their intelligence doesn't decline when they get old, a well trained dog instinctively know where to pee but humans intelligence, after their peak, might decline and starts forgetting; And since our country are built on a culture with the idealogy that when questioning the law and government is a demerit, what other suitable animal would be better than a "dog" to describe my country people?

Embrace being labeled as "dog" my fellow country man or else you're as unreasonable as a 1 year old baby whining without knowing why you whine.

Using the word "Retard"

Just to be clear for people who saw the comments on "Another Stupid Politician" post.

I don't discriminate against people who are born with a disadvantage, I only use the word "retard" against people who are born without mental defect but chose to be one. Thus i enjoy humiliating people without natural mental defect with the word "retard".

Marriage by law is a twisted form of love

Don't get me wrong, marriage is fine, but marriage by law is stupid.

It's the a rarity in law that people actually have the choice to not partake in, why would you want to give up your liberties with another law?

Why would you need the law to bind you if you truely love each other? Some say "we truely love each other but we got to protect ourselves for the future, what if one of us turns unfaithful? "
You shouldn't even marry if you still have doubts. If you need a law to force you to stay together, then you don't really know if you love each other.

And seriously? You love each other now to the point where you have the impulse for "wanting" to have a law enforced upon you but you are afraid of the future?
Then don't get married , remain dating til your love have matured enough to not having the need
of law to make you feel like staying together.

What if i want a baby? The government gives a bonus if we're legally married and have a baby.
Well , don't have a baby, If you need that bonus, it only means you financially suck and whatever great delusion you have for your baby probably won't come true and likely to be another generation of slaves. Stop gambling with people's life.

Inception (2010) Film Rant

There is absolutely no original idea and nothing is intelligent about this film

A dream in a dream in a dream has already been introduced in "Existenz"
And planting an idea via the subconscious is nothing original either . i can list bigger ideas other movies plant . "The Matrix", planting the idea into everyone in their world making them believe they are in reality and Total Recall 1990, a false 2 week vacation memory has been planted in Arnold.

And for people that says dreams and virtual reality is different, wrong. What is presented in inception is a virtual reality, because a gadget is needed to enter the psuedo-reality, and a place that is constructed for the subject to feel real using a gadget is a virtual reality. If you wanna watch a dream, watch paprika or The Holy Mountain .

So what is new in inception ? nothing .

And the movie is plain stupid, the first hour consist of only exposition, explaining the rules of the virtual reality and the next half contradicting the rules that they've made up. The conclusion is also dumb and cliche.

How did this movie get critically acclaim for its originality?

Another stupid politician

Read this, if you have no idea what is going on.
http://freddwzz.blogspot.com/2012/04/prologue-to-recent-scandal-that.html



"Charged for an offence that they were probably not aware of



I am concerned about the decision taken by the public prosecutor to charge the 44 men for having commercial sex with the the under-aged girl.

I am not defending the actions of these men. Rather, I am questioning the decision to charge them, based on the evidence that was available. According to what I read in the papers, these men were enticed by an online website that showed the girl to be 18 years old. If she was below 18 years, she must have deliberately lied about her age. Surely, she is the bigger culprit?

Let me give you this analogy. I bought a piece of cake and gave it to my friend. My friend died from food poisoning after eating the cake. I was not aware about the ingredients in the cake. Should I be charged for homicide, being the person who delivered the cake? Was I responsible to check that the cake was fit for consumption, when I had no reason to suspect otherwise?

For a person to be charged for a crime, there must be evidence that he knew of the crime or had to duty to find out. Did the police had grounds to know that the 44 men knew that the prostitute was below the legal age? If they had the duty to find out, how could it be done? Quite likely, the prostitute would not want to show her real name by producing the identity card.

Did the police ask each of the 44 men for their side of the story? Was there any reason to reject their excuse that they did not know her real age? Should these people be let off with a warning? Could they pay a penalty without being charged in court and without admission of guilt?

In Singapore, a person is condemned by public opinion when they are charged in court, regardless of whether they are eventually convicted. We are destroying the reputation and careers of 44 people by taking this drastic action. Is this the type of outcome that is desirable for the future of Singapore?

I wish to repeat that I am not condoning the action of these 44 men and that action should be taken to protect our under-aged girls. But this is probably a bad case to act on. And it may be unjust to the people who are involved.

I hope that the police and public prosecutor will review this matter and find a better solution - before more people and their families are harmed unnecessarily and excessively.

Tan Kin Lian"

That analogy he has given us, is fkin dumb.

No one would offer a poisonous cake to a friend unless you want him dead, and all these men who patronize this 17yo whore service definitely has a fetish for young cunts, so it would make perfect sense psychologically to be even more arouse by a 17yo but it would not make sense psychologically when you know the cake is poisonous and and you still offer it to your friend, unless you want him dead or you're fkin dumb.